Well, sorry. I guess we can't ALL be super cool Russian forth hacker/extropian/pretend scientists like you.
-- Ratsnatcher


Interview with Seth Shostak —Reported 2001-12-21 19:42 by Siduri

One Thing You Always Need

"Next question."

Siduri: Well, I was gonna say, I have a list of softball questions from your biggest fan, and then I have a list of hardball questions. And one of the...

Seth: The softball questions are from my biggest fan? Is that my mom?

Siduri: No, I told you that there's a guy on the list that was a big fan of yours, and was all but asking for your autograph. And so I have a list of questions from him...

Seth: I hope he's not a Czech. [I think that's what he said. He was muttering again.]

Siduri: Hum?

Mark Territory: From Scotland?

Siduri: Uh, yes.

Seth: Scotland?

TCS: Paul from Scotland?

Siduri: Yes.

Seth: Paul?

Siduri: Um, he's just seen you I think, on like, radio shows.

Seth: Seen me on radio shows.

Siduri: Or, heard you on radio shows.

TCS: Heard you on TV. [Everyone's talking at once. I'm not sure this was what Splicer said.]

Mark: Might be a stalker, I don't know.

Siduri: But he's in Scotland, so I don't think you have to worry about him. But anyway, so one of the hardball questions was: "Our own civilization has only been using radio to transmit messages for less than a hundred years. Now these messages are increasingly being delivered in a digital, often encrypted form that is practically indistinguishable from white noise. What sense does it make to search the radio spectrum for such old-fashioned messages that we ourselves have only bothered using during this brief window?"

Seth: Good question, Paul.

Siduri: No, that wasn't Paul. That was Zach.

Seth: Good question, Zach. Next question.

No, no, no, he was absolutely right. I mean, if you look at the kind of signals that we're currently using, sort of spread-spectrum signals and things like that, they're very complicated, and they're completely unlike the kind of things we look for in SETI. The kind of things we look for in SETI are signals that are just what are called narrow-band signals, that are on one spot on the radio dial. So they take all the energy of the transmitter and pump it all into one small frequency range. Okay? You with me?

Siduri: Yeah.

Seth: All right. The advantage of that is that it makes it really easy to find the signal because all the energy is in a small band so it really stands out as a big spike of energy. Whereas if you spread it out over five megahertz, like a TV signal, then the energy's spread all over the band and it's very hard to find. But on the other hand, the actual signals that we use are spread out, more and more. And ET will be at least as advanced as we are, so you might say, "Well, why would they make those narrow-band signals?"

And the answer is, probably: most of the time, they don't. For their own internal communications they probably wouldn't do that. But if you have a beacon, which you want to hear at great distance—if for some reason they want to get in touch, or they're sending the galactic weather report, whatever, GPSs—there's lots of things that would have narrow-band components in the signal. So that's what we look for. But Zach has a point.

Siduri: So the assumption is that they would have to be kind of trying to get in touch.

Seth: They might have to be trying. Or, I'm not sure I would even go that far. If you asked Marconi a hundred years ago, what would he think the radio signals would be like in the year 2001, or whaddya think people will be using this technology for in the year 2001, he wouldn't have had a very good idea. He probably wouldn't have gotten it right—not much of it, anyway. So for us to say what kind of signals ET uses, a hundred thousand years ahead of us, what kind of signals he's producing—you could guess if you want. Probably not a very good guess.

I mean, one thing you always need is high-powered radar to look for incoming comets. Long period comets. Cause they can come in, and as you know, ruin your whole day. Land in Yucatan. But I mean, he has a point. It's just that we're looking for the signals that are easy to find.

Mark Territory

Mark follows TRUTH like a shark follows BLOOD

Mark: Are we also looking for the signals that might be accidentally broadcast?

Seth: Yeah, well, that's the question, and that's the question that Zach is really asking. And Shannon jumped to the conclusion, as she is wont to do, that we can only pick up deliberately broadcast signals. But you don't know what ET's using radio for, so...

Siduri [jumping to a conclusion]: ...We could happen on something.

Seth: Yeah, we could trip on, as I say, a radar that they're using to warn about incoming Klingons, if you don't like radar warning about incoming comets. And in that case, then...

Mark: We'll get to those questions later.

Seth: And then you can say, "Well, it wasn't deliberate, but we got it anyhow," see. So in a sense SETI doesn't care. Yeah, what do we care.

Next page: How the Hell That All Works


Over.  End of Story.  Go home now.


comments powered by Disqus


T O P   S T O R I E S

Henry Juszkiewicz Destroys Gibson Guitars
by Thom 'Starky' Stark

Does anyone care about being wrong about Appalachia?
by Baron Earl

Eavesdropping on Geeks: Music to Protest By
by Flesh, Master Squid, Baron Earl, El Destino

Pigdog Journal Annual Christmas Essay Contest RUNNER UP ESSAY
by Lenny Tuberose


Baron Earl

Cliff Burton Day in Castro Valley


El Destino

When Spock met PLATO


El Destino

A musical reminder: Don't Say GIF


El Destino

Devo's one and only Christmas song


El Destino

What teenaged girls really wanted to ask David Cassidy


El Destino

Frank Sinatra told Donald Trump to "go fuck himself"


El Destino

Whatever happened to JenniCam's Jennifer Ringley?


El Destino

Iíve Made Millions Selling Fake Plastic Hillbilly Teeth


Baron Earl

Fyre Fest Lawsuit


Baron Earl

US Government uses drones to shoot M&Ms at endangered ferrets

More Quickies...